Recent Developments in Insolvency Law


Recent Developments in Insolvency Law

Italian legislative amendments promote rescue over liquidation for companies facing insolvency, in line with this year’s European Commission recommendation.

Italian lawmakers have passed two decrees which will provide welcome relief to distressed companies, promoting rescue over liquidation and bankruptcy proceedings by early intervention. The Law Decree dated 23 December 2013, No. 145, converted into law of 21 February 2014, No. 9 (the Decree), and (ii) the Law Decree of June 24, 2014, published on the Official Gazette No. 144 of June 24, 2014 (the Growth Decree) amending, inter alia, Royal Decree No. 267 of 16 march 1942 (the Bankruptcy Law) include the following changes:

• An amendment to the super-seniority regime of debts created in connection with a petition for the reservation of pre-bankruptcy agreement

• Pre-emption rights in favour of the employees of the debtor in case of sale or lease of the distressed businesses

• The possibility for a debtor under a pre-bankruptcy agreement with a going concern (concordato in continuità) to obtain the competent court authorization to participate to public tender procedures

• Amendments to the procedure of extraordinary administration applicable to large businesses.

Please see full alert below for more information.

 Download PDF

Latham & Watkins Restructuring, Insolvency & Workouts Practice Number 1739 | September 10, 2014

Recent Developments in Insolvency Law
Italian legislative amendments promote rescue over liquidation for companies facing
insolvency, in line with this year’s European Commission recommendation.
Italian lawmakers have passed two decrees which will provide welcome relief to distressed companies,
promoting rescue over liquidation and bankruptcy proceedings by early intervention. The Law Decree
dated 23 December 2013, No. 145, converted into law of 21 February 2014, No. 9 (the Decree), and (ii)
the Law Decree of June 24, 2014, published on the Official Gazette No. 144 of June 24, 2014 (the Growth
Decree) amending, inter alia, Royal Decree No. 267 of 16 march 1942 (the Bankruptcy Law) include the
following changes:
• An amendment to the super-seniority regime of debts created in connection with a petition for the
reservation of pre-bankruptcy agreement
• Pre-emption rights in favour of the employees of the debtor in case of sale or lease of the distressed
businesses
• The possibility for a debtor under a pre-bankruptcy agreement with a going concern (concordato in
continuità) to obtain the competent court authorization to participate to public tender procedures
• Amendments to the procedure of extraordinary administration applicable to large businesses.
Super-seniority
The Growth Decree has abrogated a recently introduced provision affecting the super-seniority regime
applicable to debts incurred by the debtor in the preparation of, or in connection with, a petition for
reservation of admission to a pre-bankruptcy agreement pursuant to article 161, paragraph 6 of the
Bankruptcy Law (the Reservation Petition). The Reservation Petition was introduced in 2012 to allow
debtors to file a petition to be admitted to a pre-bankruptcy agreement by filing an application with a very
limited set of information (mainly data of the company, list of creditors and financial statements relating to
the last three financial years), to be subsequently integrated in accordance with the orders of the
competent court. The debtor could subsequently choose to either continue pursuing the pre-bankruptcy
procedure or switch to a debt restructuring agreement entered into pursuant to article 182 – bis of the
Bankruptcy Law with its creditors. The Reservation Petition is aimed at allowing debtors to benefit from
certain protections, including super-seniority of new finance, applicable to restructuring procedures,
pending the definition of the restructuring plan or the achievement of the consent of the required quorum
of debtors, thus enabling the company to early address a situation of distress.
The Decree introduced a rule1 that granted super-seniority ranking to credits connected to a Reservation
Petition only if the debtor had filed timely the complete set of information to request admission to a pre-
bankruptcy procedure and if the court had admitted the debtor to the pre-bankruptcy procedure. The
amendment had been highly criticized because banks, creditors and suppliers became reluctant to
support the business of the debtor at the stage of the Reservation Petition, since, in case of failure by the
Latham & Watkins Client Alert No. 1739 | September 10, 2014 | Page 2
debtor to timely file the complete set of information or in case of rejection by the court of the application,
the new creditors’ receivables would not have been super-senior. Also, the newly introduced provision did
not contemplate the case in which the court would not admit the debtor to a pre-bankruptcy procedure
because the debtor opted to enter into an agreement pursuant to article 182-bis of the Bankruptcy Law,
as the law allows.
In addition to the above, commentators emphasized that the provision did not clearly rule out super-
seniority of the above-mentioned credits, thus adding uncertainty to the legal framework applicable in
such crucial phases of a restructuring proceeding.
With the Growth Decree, the Italian legislators cancelled the interpretative rule, clarifying that credits
incurred by the debtor in the preparation of, or in connection with, a Reservation Petition are super-senior.
Such super-seniority should apply also to credits arisen when the interpretative rule was in force,
considering the interpretative, rather than innovative, nature of the rule, provided that no judgement by a
competent court on the seniority of such credit took place before the entry into force of the Growth
Decree.
Pre-emption rights in favor of the employees
The employees of a company that is declared bankrupt — under a pre-bankruptcy agreement,
extraordinary administration (amministrazione straordinaria) or mandatory winding up (liquidazione coatta
amministrativa) — can form a cooperative company. That cooperative company has the right to be
preferred to third parties, at the same terms and conditions, in the acquisition or lease of the business
(azienda), part of the business (ramo di azienda) or pools of assets (complessi di beni) and contracts
belonging to the distressed business.
Apparently, only the sale of single assets is excluded from the scope of application of the pre-emption
right. While, seemingly, the pool of assets and contracts needs not be composed of assets and contracts
functionally connected, but only comprising a plurality of assets, to trigger the pre-emption right.
In addition, the new rule does not specify the requirements and form that the notice triggering the pre-
emption right (denuntiatio) should have, nor the term within which the pre-emption right must be
exercised.
In the absence of an express provision of law, it is reasonable to expect that the court may set the
formalities and the term to exercise the pre-emption right, possibly applying the provisions of article 104,
paragraph 4 of the Bankruptcy Law, which grants a five-day term to exercise the pre-emption right. Such
timing would be compatible with the need to rapidly define the procedure, while the term set forth by law
in connection with the exercise of other legal pre-emption rights — ranging from 30 to 60 days — would
be unreasonably long and would cause excessive uncertainty.
The Decree also specifies that in case the lease or sale is awarded to the cooperative formed by the
employees, such employees can be paid in advance the sums to which they are entitled as a mobility
indemnity (indennità di mobilità) and unemployment indemnity (Aspi). Those employees who do not
adhere to the cooperative shall be subject to the regular unemployment indemnity regime.

Latham & Watkins Client Alert No. 1739 | September 10, 2014 | Page 3
Court authorization to participate in public tenders
Pursuant to the new provisions enacted with the Decree, debtors who filed a petition to be admitted to a
pre-bankruptcy agreement with going concern (concordato in continuità), may participate in public tender
procedures, provided that the court grants its authorization with the prior opinion by the judicial officer,
when appointed.
Further, in order to increase the pre-bankruptcy proceeding’s chances of success and compatibility with
the performance of the public contract, the public contracting entity now may directly pay sub-contractors
and other third party creditors involved, pursuant to the court’s guidelines.
Extraordinary administration procedural amendments
The Decree allows the Ministry of Development to grant a further 24-month extension of the term to
complete a dismissal plan of a company under extraordinary administration, thus extending to four years
the possible maximum duration of the dismissal plan. The extension is subject to a favorable report by the
judicial officer (commissario giudiziale) confirming that the extension increases the business’ chances of
continuation.
The Decree also added a clarification with regard to the value of the assets to be dismissed by the
debtors under an extraordinary administration procedure.
Pursuant to Article 63 of Legislative Decree of July 8, 1999, No. 270, the determination of the sale price
by the expert appointed by the extraordinary commissioner must be calculated deducting the forecasted
badwill for the two following years. In consideration of the reduction, the purchaser must undertake to
continue the business for the two following years, meeting the employment level requirements set forth in
the deed of sale.
It was debated whether the price so determined was to be deemed mandatory, and not capable of being
amended by the officer in charge of the proceeding, in order for the sale to be validly effected. The
Decree now allows more flexibility, clarifying that the value of the assets to be calculated pursuant to the
applicable law should not be considered a mandatorily applied amount for the sale to be valid.
The purchaser’s obligation to meet the employment level requirements for at least two years, as
described above, is still in force.
European framework developments
Parallel to these developments in Italy, the European Parliament voted on 5 February 2014 on the
European Commission’s (EC’s) proposal to modernize Europe’s rules on cross-border insolvency
amending the European Insolvency Regulation (1346/2000/EC).2 The proposal aims to reduce disparities
between national laws that can create uncertainty and an unfriendly business environment thus
negatively affecting cross-border investments.
Pending the final approval of the amendments to the European Insolvency Regulation (1346/2000/EC),
the EC published in the Official Journal of the European Union the Recommendation 2014/135/EU on a
new approach to business failure and insolvency (the Recommendation) aimed at addressing some of the
issues which have already emerged in the context of the consultation for revision process mentioned
above.

Latham & Watkins Client Alert No. 1739 | September 10, 2014 | Page 4
The Recommendation is not binding and Member States are not required to enact domestic legislation to
implement it. Although the Commission will monitor if, and to what extent, Member States implement the
Recommendation over the next 18 months, it is difficult, at present, to anticipate the impact it will have in
practice, also due the fact that some aspects are inextricably linked to substantive local law issues and
will therefore require a complex process to overcome possible resistance at a national level.
The Recommendation proposes, in particular, to provide for (a) a restructuring framework allowing
debtors to restructure their business with the objective of preventing insolvency and (b) a second chance
for good faith entrepreneurs so that, unless there has been dishonesty, such entrepreneurs are
discharged of their debts within three years of the start of any repayment plan or process that implements
a liquidation process in relation to their assets.
The Recommendation calls on EU Member States to amend their respective national restructuring legal
frameworks to include provisions that allow the debtor to access restructuring schemes as soon as it is
apparent that there is a likelihood of insolvency, retaining control over the day-to-day operation of their
business. The Recommendation also suggests to introduce:
• The possibility to request a four-month stay of individual enforcement actions, which can be renewed
up to a total of 12 months
• The possibility to adopt a restructuring plan binding on all creditors with the favourable vote of the
majority of creditors and the court approval of the plan
• The possibility to obtain new financing necessary to implement a restructuring plan without any risk
that the financing can be declared void, voidable or unenforceable as an act detrimental to the
general body of creditors
• The possibility to implement a restructuring plan without court proceedings, although the court should
be able to intervene and appoint a mediator or supervisor if appropriate
• The detailed description of matters to be included in any restructuring plan, so that the court can
confirm plans with expediency and, in principle, in a written procedure
Although some amendments may be necessary to fully align to the Recommendation, Italian Bankruptcy
Law is substantially in line with it: in the recent years, the Italian legislators introduced several
amendments to the Bankruptcy Law particularly with the aim of promoting rescue over liquidation
proceedings by early intervention and giving debtors the ability to start afresh (see our Alerts No. 1363 of
July 12, 2012, No. 1151 of February 24, 2011, No. 1080 of September 13, 2010).

Latham & Watkins Client Alert No. 1739 | September 10, 2014 | Page 5

If you have questions about this Client Alert, please contact one of the authors listed below or the Latham
lawyer with whom you normally consult:
Maria Cristina Storchi
mariacristina.storchi@lw.com
+39.02.3046.2044
Milan

Andrea Novarese
andrea.novarese@lw.com
+39.02.30462043
Milan

Simona Bormida
simona.bormida@lw.com
+39024062048
Milan

You Might Also Be Interested In
Decree Law No. 78 of 31 May 2010 as Converted by Law No. 122 of 30 July 2010: Additional Changes to Italian
Bankruptcy Law
La legge di conversione del decreto legge n. 78 del 31 maggio 2010 apporta ulteriori modifiche alla legge
fallimentare
Insolvency reforms in Europe

Client Alert is published by Latham & Watkins as a news reporting service to clients and other friends.
The information contained in this publication should not be construed as legal advice. Should further
analysis or explanation of the subject matter be required, please contact the lawyer with whom you
normally consult. A complete list of Latham’s Client Alerts can be found at www.lw.com. If you wish to
update your contact details or customize the information you receive from Latham & Watkins, visit
http://events.lw.com/reaction/subscriptionpage.html to subscribe to the firm’s global client mailings
program.

1 Purportedly, an interpretative rule meant to clarify the interpretation of an existing principle rather than amending the existing law
and, as such, applicable to all Reservation Petitions, including those filed before the entering into force of the Decree.
2 The amendments mainly aim at:
• Extending the rules to cover rescue proceedings
• Creating an EU-wide system of web-based insolvency registers
• Avoiding the opening of multiple proceedings
• Dealing with the insolvency of groups of companies

Download PDF[288KB]
Email
Report

Note close

Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.

We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.

Please choose one of the above to proceed!

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

You may also like...

2 Responses

  1. drakino says:

    Would be nice to see the Media/Blu-ray remote from the PS3 also work on the PS4.

  2. TheWestchesterNews says:

    It’s like the pot calling the kettle black. nnNew York Courts and court clerks are embedded with injustice on every side and at every level. nnThere has never been so much corruption in the courtrooms, it got even wo1e than before or maybe it has always been this corrupt at the higher levels. Who really knows?nnThe New York Bar Association has over 400 membe1, they hold none of them for wrong doing or misconduct, it’s a lawye1 secret illuminati occult. Shameful. nnAndrew Cuomo is under investigation for public corruption, he should appoint no one. Corruption and Corrupt Judges go hand in hand. They have no one to be held accountable to that is why we have so many corrupt courtrooms, stained and tainted robes of justice.nnNew York State is the most corrupt state throughout the country. Hands down!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *